Six patterns that define production RAG architecture. What each one does, what it costs, and when it earns its complexity. Use the diagnostic below to find your starting point.
A good RAG system is not defined by retrieval alone. It is defined by the architecture around it: query understanding, context selection, evidence quality, evaluation, governance, and production behaviour. This series breaks down the major RAG patterns with architecture diagrams and engineering reasoning for each. You will not just learn what each pattern is; you will learn when it earns its complexity, what it costs to add, and how to choose the right design using evaluation signals instead of architectural hype.
Click to enlarge
Answer two questions. Get a personalised reading path through the series.
Where are you right now?
This determines your starting point in the series.
What is your system failing to do?
Select everything that applies. Each failure maps to a specific capability.
Expand any card to see key techniques, the primary risk, and a link to the full post.
Select two patterns and see how they differ across use case, complexity, cost, and risk.
Each post goes deeper on the architecture, trade-offs, and implementation decisions.